propose an interesting comment found Grillo's Blog:
HISTORY-taught a Master of Democracy which was "Gaetano Salvemini"-is made from Dialects and the clash between organized minority, conscious and active, which won inertia MAJORITY disorganized, drag it one direction or another, TOWARDS A NEW OR OLD ORDER.
came today at least two factors that had made safe the Italian Constitution.
1) The end of the bipolar international (US-USSR) returned to Italy the country's history "natural", as mentioned later, again, not surprisingly, from where it left off before they opened the brackets constitutional, and that since precostituzionale.
2) Globalization and the transition to a postindustrial led to the disappearance or social irrelevance of the "working class".
The disappearance of this collective subject of history was not only a loss of the left, but for democracy, because the working class was working as a virtual political catalyst of the general masses and center of gravity of the entire political system, forced a ruotare intorno a questo asse.Lo stesso Partito popolare di don Sturzo,poi trasformatosi nella Democrazia Cristiana,nacque dall'esigenza di sottrarre le masse popolari alla sirena dei partiti di sinistra,costruendo un possibile polo politico riformista alternativo.
La smobilitazione di questo soggetto collettivo(la Classe operaia)è equivalsa alla smobilitazione delle masse popolari e alla perdita di un baricentro per le componenti più evolute della Nazione.
Le masse sono tornate a essere,così come erano sempre state nel tardo Feudalesimo,soggetto passivo della storia,manipolabile dall'alto.
Venuto meno il bipolarismo internazionale e scomparsa la classe operaia,la Costituzione è divenuta come un vaso di coccio tra i vasi di iron that majorities for years to "change it to empty it with plans for reform, but ordinary laws of constitutional substance, practice policies.
now its preservation seems to be entrusted only to some cultural elites and minorities, the heirs of those who created it.
elites survive only thanks to some institutional protected enclaves, like those of the Constitutional Court (recently adopted by Berlusconi almost a hotbed of "community" has become a Maginot line against increasing attempts to break through constitutional applicants) and the judiciary against which, not surprisingly, has run all the pressure of the system.
There are also the minority of society civile,che si mobilitano nelle piazze,nei circuiti culturali alternativi e anche all'interno degli stessi schieramenti parlamentari.
Quel che appare significativo è che la mancata "interiorizzazione" dei valori costituzionali appare trasversale alle maggioranze interne ai due schieramenti di centro-destra e di centro-sinistra,anche se si manifesta con modalità diverse.
Sul primo schieramento(c.ds)non è il caso di dilungarsi,essendo sotto gli occhi di tutti ad es.il rifiuto di alcuni vertici,prolungato negli anni,di partecipare alle celebrazioni della Resistenza da cui nacque la Costituzione e alla demonizzazione della Costituzione come "comunista"o "vecchia".
Quanto al secondo schieramento(c.sn)si consideri la sperimentata availability of so many senior figures in the top (D'Alema-Violante-etc.) to consider the constitutional principles, the principles related to the essence of the state, not mandatory, but as a possible bargaining chip in political negotiations ordinary quotas . (for es.la Bicameral).
On one side of the balance of the state and the fundamental principles of democracy, on the relevant counterparts at the waterline of the majority or the achievement of policy objectives as priorities of the moment.
Emblematic of this is doubtful, for es.le situations regarding the weighted decision not to regulate, during the center-left governments, conflict of interest and set a public television e privato che,per ovvi motivi,incidono sul modo di essere dello Stato e della democrazia.
La risoluzione del conflitto di interessi-realizzata mediante la separazione del patrimonio personale del sovrano da quello della collettività-è all'origine della fondazione dello Stato moderno in Europa.
Altri esempi dell'indifferenza ai valori costituzionali da parte del centro-sinistra,sono:il Lapsus subito rilevato dagli organi di stampa,della mancata citazione della Costituzione Italiana nel Manifesto col quale alla fine del 2006 il Partito democratico declinava la propria identità politico-culturale,l'elaborazione della famosa bozza Boato nella commissione Bicamerale per le riforme del 1997,rispetto alla quale le bozze di scarto dei costituenti dell'Italia del 1948 sembrano capolavori inarrivabili di cultura democratica-liberale,infine,la corresponsabilità nell'emanazione di tante leggi definite dalla stampa "ad personas" e "ad castam".
Un deragliamento culturale che giunge sino alle più recenti proposte formulate da esponenti di prestigio del centro-sinistra di modificare la composizione del CSM,prevista dalla Costituzione,in modo da rendere maggioritaria la componente di nomina politica e di privare il Pubblico Ministero del potere di iniziare autonomamente le indagini,riservandone l'iniziativa solo alle forze di polizia dipendenti dal potere politico.
Quel che appare interessante è la straordinaria coerenza culturale che,come un unico filo rosso,inanella la sequenza policy initiatives, institutional Dipre, laws which fifteen are secretly undoing the fabric of the Constitution of 1948, weaving a web of restructuring in the sense of authoritarian rule and democracy, closer to the cultural identity of the majority of the country.
What we are witnessing is in fact as an extraordinary revival of deep-seated cultural codes typically premodern national: a shift from modernity to the rule of law focuses on the primacy of impersonal impersonal power of the law equal for all, to a degree of pre-modernity ... -which was late feudal-type personal luxury, free from controls and above the law. Short hints of
above steps:
1) Popular sovereignty has been cleared by the deprivation of the right to choose their representatives in the elections by a vote of preference (porcellum-Calderoli) Parliament has been reduced to an assembly appointed by the Prince (Berlusconi ) less than half a dozen oligarchs who selects parliamentary staff on the basis of political loyalty and allegiance ... Consequently, the separation between the executive and the legislature has shrunk dramatically since an assembly of appointed from above, no relationship with the territory, can not ratify the laws that have been packaged by the oligarchs who occupy the executive, except that there is no internal fractures among them.
2) The laws of the judicial reform aimed at bring the judiciary under the control of executive power, are also gradually reducing the separation between the judiciary and the executive in favor of the latter.
3) The systematic occupation by the oligarchs in all areas of television and the elimination of all traces of real-time visibility of machine power (think of the reform of interception and also prohibiting the publication of the pleadings no longer be confidential) determine the censorship of free press and the culture of the masses infantilization returned to the same democratic illiteracy that marked the past the history of the Italians.
The cultural legitimacy of the conflict of interests, marks a return to the personalistic conception of power which belongs to the Italic tradition.
Thus the separation and balance of power is returning to the monarchical type of vertical merger. The Italian
neofeudalesimo crowded with many vassals in search of their prince, happy to be so many subjects, from many intellectuals whose ultimate goal is to become the prince of Consigliori on duty and to be enrolled on his payroll, seems to be a re- the story more real and authentic in the country.
A country that has missed its appointment with modernity, going straight from pre-modernity late-when feudalism still the rule of law was not born-to poatmodernità, characterized by the global crisis of the rule of law, without having had time to experience the season of modernity.
Those two or three centuries during which in countries like France, Britain, the United States have established the culture of modernity: the Enlightenment, liberalism, the modern constitutionalism, the Modena foundational democratic state of law.
So we come to the modern culture of "profit with no rules and no limits.
What to do? Who will save this country from itself?
The lesson of history shows that in some critical junctures the country is not saved by her but by majorities its minorities.
were minorities who have made the Risorgimento, turning a
people of tribes into a nation.
were minorities who have made the resistance and have designed the
Constitution.
And those are the minorities who now seems to be entrusted with the defense of the Constitution
.
The defense of the Constitution remains as the last spiaggia.Sino
remain alive, we will always start from where.
will always be possible by the Constitutional Court to cancel the umpteenth
law "unworkable" that endorses a political party and the other
deployment keeps them alive.
Save the Constitution is to save the best part of our
storia.
NON DEVE SCORAGGIARE FARE PARTE DI UNA MINORANZA.
Gli storici e gli analisti del potere sanno bene che la storia non è fatta dalle maggioranze disorganizzate,nè dalle oligarchie paralitiche.
Oggi viviamo una fase della storia nella quale le minoranze eredi di quelle che vollero la Costituzione,che vollero il Concilio Vaticano II,che realizzarono lo statuto dei lavoratori e che sono il seme e il simbolo di un'altra Italia possibile,sembranoessere divenute orfane di rappresentanza e guida politica,perchè troppo a lungo tradite da oligarchie partitiche paralitiche,autoreferenziali e interessate solo alla propria riproduzione.
Forse è tempo che qualcosa muoia perchè qualcosa di nuovo possa nascere.
E'tempo that each takes on the burden and the responsibility to help the old man to die to make the new nascere.Giacchè of the future is not the time comes and sopraggiunge.Il future is the time that we build together. E-
Salvemini-to name each one of us will in the future so that you will put in if stesso.Solo who surrenders to the facts will not find anything, because you will put anything.
Roberto Scarpinato Attorney-General of Caltanissetta-
0 comments:
Post a Comment