Sexual dimorphism
Sexual dimorphism is the difference in physical size between the original male / female of the same species. on wikipedia there are some examples: insects have major differences, as in fish, then there are birds, but also morphological differences are noted in mammals such as elephant, lion, etc.. and where is the female spotted hyena have a larger body than the male.
Sexual dimorphism serves to attract individuals of the opposite sex, or to fight to defend the flock with other individuals to the area. In birds, like pheasants or peacocks, the livery is precisely to attract females for mating. More colors are striking, they are more likely to perpetuate the species. As we know, gorillas, lions and many herbivores are fighting among themselves to defend a harem of females of smaller size.
We men do not have a marked difference between the sexes, we would like the wolves, where the leader of the pack can be either male or female.
but I do not want to compare humans to birds, even a gorilla and the chimpanzee, and if there was a hominid that still exists it would take as a reference point. However, we can see in our behavior, attitudes like that adopt these animals.
If the peacocks use the colors and feathers to show their "goodness" of genetics, in human females are just using precisely strut adorned with makeup, fashion, etc..
The women's clothing gives us a lot of information: what is the skirt, the neckline, the intimate lace, transparent fabrics, socks, etc.. ? It almost seems that the clothes are designed to facilitate women's access to the erogenous zones.
Take for example the woman who wears a skirt slit that goes up to his chin and neckline that reaches to the ankles, he looked angry as if to say, do not you do even if they kill me.
We see a contradiction between a culture that tends in the direction of chastity, renunciation of passions, excesses, and so on. and an innate tendency anthropological or that seems to be in the opposite direction. Let's underwear embroidered and colored in a manic, what they are, if you find yourself or open yourself?
short, the female population wears accessories aimed at seduction. Even the man cares and wants to seduce but not comparable with the interest nurtured by women.
Not only that, the females compete among themselves, are often taken by rivalries, jealousies and backbiting. There is an undergrowth behavioral stride and is opposed to the current culture.
Why do women have to be handsome, desired, attractive, etc..? If a woman is ugly or has some physical defects or suffer the pace of aging is a source of great frustration, while men can be bad without too many dramas of life.
Some may say that in general males are larger than females, but this can be depended on the necessity of giving birth. The female body has to endure the additional stress that pregnancy, so the males, since you do not have this feature, found to have a more muscular body.
In conclusion, I do not know how we should be, how to balance the natural inclinations with cultural proclivities. This should solve the dilemma anthropologists, sexologists, sociologists and all categories that deal with these things. I could not do it because I miss many elements of research and then do another job because, when I do, and I can not put myself to do even the theologian, psychologist, anthropologist, and so on.
I leave you with a question mark and reflection.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Audiovox Portable Dvd Player Say No Disc
wreath
I always dreamed of wearing a laurel wreath on his head, not to imitate the Roman emperors or the Greek athletes, but the poets or sages. I then opened in this role by reciting a few poems already posted on this blog.
I always dreamed of wearing a laurel wreath on his head, not to imitate the Roman emperors or the Greek athletes, but the poets or sages. I then opened in this role by reciting a few poems already posted on this blog.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Australian Bulk Foods
But what crisis! How to give a couple of billion to Silvio and live happily
Carried verbatim found a nice article on the net that sheds light on the enormous conflict of interest falling solely on the shoulders of taxpayers. A "communism" upside down! If this frequency analog-liberalization presents to Silvio also add the 98 billion of video poker in the hands of the mafia not collected by the State, Italy will not fail (?).
I also learned today that the President of the Molise earns more than the U.S. President ... we have 2 accounts?!
"So, my friends. Sometimes the news does not hurt. Even if it is news that hurts. I'll go briefly and then pass the ball to more talented than me, it does not take much. So the story is this: the freedom of digital terrestrial analogue frequencies. E 'progress. In around the world, therefore, governments are selling these frequencies vacated by the analog camera. Who buys them? The operratori mobile, so that they have good rates to sell their products. In short, is a bargain. A bargain for the state, for the budget, and thus ultimately to taxpayers. In 2009, the U.S. government has cashed in this way the beauty of 19 billion dollars. The German government is doing auctions these days, cash out from 4 to € 8 billion, thrown away ... According to the European Commission, the value of these frequencies is clear that you could sell 44 million euro, not bad, eh! All European countries are preparing to sell their frequencies to mobile o comunque a cederle, perché quelle frequenze analogiche possono avere due tipi di valore: 1) per il mercato. 2) per la democrazia dell’informazione, infatti potrebbero servire per portare la banda larga dappertutto. E qual è l’unico paese europeo che non le vende, ma le regala? Quello italiano. E a chi le regala? Alle televisioni, cioè Rai e Mediaset. Bello, eh! Aggiungo di mio: e chi è il ministro delle Attività Produttive, che sovrintende anche le Comunicazioni, che ha questa bella trovata dopo le dimissioni di Scajola? Ad interim… Silvio Berlusconi! Ecco. Io ve l’ho fatta facile. Molto più bravi di me sono Roberta Carlini che ne ha scritto su L’Espresso ( leggi here) and Enrico Grazzini who wrote about Sbilanciamoci.info (see also here ). For the rest, silence. Strange, eh? Just when you are looking for 25 billion, giving a couple Silvio ... "
Carried verbatim found a nice article on the net that sheds light on the enormous conflict of interest falling solely on the shoulders of taxpayers. A "communism" upside down! If this frequency analog-liberalization presents to Silvio also add the 98 billion of video poker in the hands of the mafia not collected by the State, Italy will not fail (?).
I also learned today that the President of the Molise earns more than the U.S. President ... we have 2 accounts?!
"So, my friends. Sometimes the news does not hurt. Even if it is news that hurts. I'll go briefly and then pass the ball to more talented than me, it does not take much. So the story is this: the freedom of digital terrestrial analogue frequencies. E 'progress. In around the world, therefore, governments are selling these frequencies vacated by the analog camera. Who buys them? The operratori mobile, so that they have good rates to sell their products. In short, is a bargain. A bargain for the state, for the budget, and thus ultimately to taxpayers. In 2009, the U.S. government has cashed in this way the beauty of 19 billion dollars. The German government is doing auctions these days, cash out from 4 to € 8 billion, thrown away ... According to the European Commission, the value of these frequencies is clear that you could sell 44 million euro, not bad, eh! All European countries are preparing to sell their frequencies to mobile o comunque a cederle, perché quelle frequenze analogiche possono avere due tipi di valore: 1) per il mercato. 2) per la democrazia dell’informazione, infatti potrebbero servire per portare la banda larga dappertutto. E qual è l’unico paese europeo che non le vende, ma le regala? Quello italiano. E a chi le regala? Alle televisioni, cioè Rai e Mediaset. Bello, eh! Aggiungo di mio: e chi è il ministro delle Attività Produttive, che sovrintende anche le Comunicazioni, che ha questa bella trovata dopo le dimissioni di Scajola? Ad interim… Silvio Berlusconi! Ecco. Io ve l’ho fatta facile. Molto più bravi di me sono Roberta Carlini che ne ha scritto su L’Espresso ( leggi here) and Enrico Grazzini who wrote about Sbilanciamoci.info (see also here ). For the rest, silence. Strange, eh? Just when you are looking for 25 billion, giving a couple Silvio ... "
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Sayings Wedding Programs
Ethics anthropological
There ethic that goes beyond the culture of 'experience of religion. A' Ethics same for everyone, for all races, at all times and everywhere. ethics anthropological or biological?
ethic of the sort exists and meets in times of crisis when it applies to every man for himself when jump all the schemes and do not follow the rules more.
admit that there is a wreck, the ship is sinking: Who is saved? You always save the first women and children or old. But the old would be the weak, the sick. In 200 thousand years of history, old age is a recent phenomenon. However, the elderly leave room for the young and stalwart. But why, in a crisis situation, to limit, the male being stronger, you throw the lifeboats, leaving behind the weakest according to the logic of the jungle or the jungle ? Why you choose to save women and children?
admit that on a desert island calling a lot of men who take the boats by force and among them there are only very few women and children, what would happen ?
deserted island there would be no war, more male, more aggresività , more women, more sweetness.
Moreover, the human species would be hopelessly compromised because a few women who would other people? On the contrary, saving only women and children (next generation), arrived on a desert island, would be enough even the presence of a few males to secure continuation of the species.
Thus, an ethic biological / anthropological that goes beyond culture or revealed truth of our religion with commandments of God command. Fascism is regimentation, conformation. A male god and severe fascistic, perhaps a female goddess and is benevolent socialist?
There is an ethic that disregards everything. We, at this moment, in this time of crisis, after all the years of history, evolution, progress, what are we saving? Who is saved in our time? Saved only old males.
There ethic that goes beyond the culture of 'experience of religion. A' Ethics same for everyone, for all races, at all times and everywhere. ethics anthropological or biological?
ethic of the sort exists and meets in times of crisis when it applies to every man for himself when jump all the schemes and do not follow the rules more.
admit that there is a wreck, the ship is sinking: Who is saved? You always save the first women and children or old. But the old would be the weak, the sick. In 200 thousand years of history, old age is a recent phenomenon. However, the elderly leave room for the young and stalwart. But why, in a crisis situation, to limit, the male being stronger, you throw the lifeboats, leaving behind the weakest according to the logic of the jungle or the jungle ? Why you choose to save women and children?
admit that on a desert island calling a lot of men who take the boats by force and among them there are only very few women and children, what would happen ?
deserted island there would be no war, more male, more aggresività , more women, more sweetness.
Moreover, the human species would be hopelessly compromised because a few women who would other people? On the contrary, saving only women and children (next generation), arrived on a desert island, would be enough even the presence of a few males to secure continuation of the species.
Thus, an ethic biological / anthropological that goes beyond culture or revealed truth of our religion with commandments of God command. Fascism is regimentation, conformation. A male god and severe fascistic, perhaps a female goddess and is benevolent socialist?
There is an ethic that disregards everything. We, at this moment, in this time of crisis, after all the years of history, evolution, progress, what are we saving? Who is saved in our time? Saved only old males.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Business Aviation 2010
The buff - Lett. open to Tettamanzi
naked really lived in Eden? Naturists are right? In my opinion clothes were in paradise. I say this for a number of simple conclusions: when it's cold we should dress, and when it is hot we should cover us to defend ourselves from the sun.
If we were to go bare facts should be covered with hair like monkeys right to defend ourselves from the weather.
Man is still completely covered with hair, on our skin there are lots of tiny hairs. This means that this body has atrophied over time. No longer has its original function due to the fact that, at some point, we began to get dressed. When an organ is no longer used are atrophied, retires losing its original function. What could
happen? Evidently, the old have begun to wear the skins of hunted animals. Perhaps, initially used as a fetish and then, over time, will become common practice to wear protective clothing. The furs, in addition to better defend the body from the elements, have solved another problem that haunts all animals with a thick hair: fleas. The lack of hair is a sign of cleanliness. The monkeys spend much time grooming each other. The use of leather will have solved this problem thus enabling human communities to gain a lot more time to devote to something else.
perhaps, have more free time will favor the development of language, communication, exchange d'informazioni.
Ma allora, cosa vuol dire essere nudi nell'Eden se poi in realtà erano vestiti? Sicuramente questa è un'altra metafora. Come ho accennato l'altra volta nel video Il frutto della conoscenza , il coprirsi con le foglie di fico rispondeva al sentimento di gelosia suscitato dal concetto di proprietà privata. Con la scoperta dell'agricoltura e l'allevamento, nacque l'esigenza di difendere cose, piante, animali e persone all'interno di territori posseduti e circoscritti. L'uomo, divenuto così stanziale, non permetteva a nessun altro di accedere nel proprio territorio. Da li la necessità di circondare, coprire, occultare ad occhi estranei l'intimità domestica per non renderla appetibile a nessuno.
Vicino alla gelosia bisogna accostare anche il sentimento di vergogna. Mostrarsi nudi è vergognoso. Tempo fa feci un video dove, mostrando le mie "vergogne", mi "misi a nudo" parlando delle bollette da pagare . Gran parte della gente avrebbe un po' di reticenza a "scoprire" intimi particolari della propria vita privata.
Nella nostra società capitalistica e competitiva, mostrare le proprie debolezze può essere pericoloso. Infatti, tutti tendono a coprirsi, a dare un'immagine di se forte e migliore. Mai far trapelare difetti, mai mostrare il fianco perché c'è sempre qualcuno che se ne approfitta. Mai dire al proprio datore di lavoro di essere in difficoltà, di avere debiti perché may work against you enslavement, by acquiring in "his territory" because of your weakness.
Evidently, at one time, unlike today, you could lay bare, that show the intimacy of one's feelings, difficulties and uncertainties without fear, since they would find comfort in others, understanding, solidarity, brotherhood and all things mentioned in the Gospel regularly set aside. Everyone could express their anxieties without fear of being subdued, conquered, built in another precinct or suffer any act of power which would degrade it.
Today we see as the threat or blackmail is also widely distributed at high levels, enough to see the famous dossier on political or industrial espionage, etc.. It turns out the weakness, the shame of someone and it threatens to get benefits to expand its area of \u200b\u200binfluence and empower.
naked really lived in Eden? Naturists are right? In my opinion clothes were in paradise. I say this for a number of simple conclusions: when it's cold we should dress, and when it is hot we should cover us to defend ourselves from the sun.
If we were to go bare facts should be covered with hair like monkeys right to defend ourselves from the weather.
Man is still completely covered with hair, on our skin there are lots of tiny hairs. This means that this body has atrophied over time. No longer has its original function due to the fact that, at some point, we began to get dressed. When an organ is no longer used are atrophied, retires losing its original function. What could
happen? Evidently, the old have begun to wear the skins of hunted animals. Perhaps, initially used as a fetish and then, over time, will become common practice to wear protective clothing. The furs, in addition to better defend the body from the elements, have solved another problem that haunts all animals with a thick hair: fleas. The lack of hair is a sign of cleanliness. The monkeys spend much time grooming each other. The use of leather will have solved this problem thus enabling human communities to gain a lot more time to devote to something else.
perhaps, have more free time will favor the development of language, communication, exchange d'informazioni.
Ma allora, cosa vuol dire essere nudi nell'Eden se poi in realtà erano vestiti? Sicuramente questa è un'altra metafora. Come ho accennato l'altra volta nel video Il frutto della conoscenza , il coprirsi con le foglie di fico rispondeva al sentimento di gelosia suscitato dal concetto di proprietà privata. Con la scoperta dell'agricoltura e l'allevamento, nacque l'esigenza di difendere cose, piante, animali e persone all'interno di territori posseduti e circoscritti. L'uomo, divenuto così stanziale, non permetteva a nessun altro di accedere nel proprio territorio. Da li la necessità di circondare, coprire, occultare ad occhi estranei l'intimità domestica per non renderla appetibile a nessuno.
Vicino alla gelosia bisogna accostare anche il sentimento di vergogna. Mostrarsi nudi è vergognoso. Tempo fa feci un video dove, mostrando le mie "vergogne", mi "misi a nudo" parlando delle bollette da pagare . Gran parte della gente avrebbe un po' di reticenza a "scoprire" intimi particolari della propria vita privata.
Nella nostra società capitalistica e competitiva, mostrare le proprie debolezze può essere pericoloso. Infatti, tutti tendono a coprirsi, a dare un'immagine di se forte e migliore. Mai far trapelare difetti, mai mostrare il fianco perché c'è sempre qualcuno che se ne approfitta. Mai dire al proprio datore di lavoro di essere in difficoltà, di avere debiti perché may work against you enslavement, by acquiring in "his territory" because of your weakness.
Evidently, at one time, unlike today, you could lay bare, that show the intimacy of one's feelings, difficulties and uncertainties without fear, since they would find comfort in others, understanding, solidarity, brotherhood and all things mentioned in the Gospel regularly set aside. Everyone could express their anxieties without fear of being subdued, conquered, built in another precinct or suffer any act of power which would degrade it.
Today we see as the threat or blackmail is also widely distributed at high levels, enough to see the famous dossier on political or industrial espionage, etc.. It turns out the weakness, the shame of someone and it threatens to get benefits to expand its area of \u200b\u200binfluence and empower.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)